International Security Alastair Iain Johnston [Figures] The People's Republic of China PRC is more integrated into, and more cooperative within, regional and global political and economic systems than ever in its history.
Yet there is growing uneasiness in the United States and the Asia-Pacific region about the implications of China's increasing economic and military power. Characterizations of Chinese diplomacy in the policy and scholarly worlds are, if anything, less optimistic of late about China's adherence to regional and international norms.
In the s there was little discussion in the United States and elsewhere about whether China was or was not part of something called "the international community. The subtext is a fairly sharp othering of China that includes a civilizing discourse China is not yet a civilized state or perhaps a sports discourse China is a cheater.
Many of the most vigorous policy debates in the United States in recent years have been over whether it is even possible to socialize a dictatorial, nationalistic, and dissatisfied China within this putative international community.
Engagers argue that China is becoming socialized, though mainly in thesphere of economic norms e. Skeptics either conclude that this is not the case, due to the nature of the regime for some, China is still Red China; for more sophisticated skeptics, China is flirting with fascism , or that it could not possibly happen because China as a rising power, by definition, is dissatisfied with the U.
Global Hegemon theory and the Rise of China
A logical conclusion is that both groups view the problem of China's rising power as the primary [End Page 5] source of instability in Sino-U. This article explores the degree to which China's leaders are pursuing status quo or revisionist foreign policies.
Create a new account
It examines the evidence for and against the most common characterization of China—that it is a dissatisfied, revisionist state, expressed in everything from a desire to resolve the Taiwan issue in its favor to excluding U. That is, the argument falls generally within a power-transition version of realism where a static set of interests—the desire to establish a great power's sphere of influence—interact with changing Chinese relative capabilities to give China more opportunities to challenge U.
I suggest that this line of argument is insufficiently attentive to the analytic ambiguities in the terms "status quo" and "revisionism" as used in international relations theory and practice. Moreover, this hypothesis fails to examine both the status quo elements in Chinese diplomacy over the last couple ofdecades and the problematic status of the empirical evidence used to makeclaims about PRC revisionism.
In short, it is not clear that describing China as a revisionist or non-status quo state is accurate at this moment in history. In the last decade or so in the United States, many scholars, pundits, and policymakers have characterized China as a state operating outside of, or only partly inside, the so-called international community on a range of international norms.
As Secretary of Defense William Perry noted in a speech in Seattle in , engagement was a strategy for getting China to act like a "responsible world power.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
LOG IN. International Security.
Is China a Status Quo Power? Alastair I.
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: International Security If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE. Additional Information. Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Contact Contact Us Help.